Peer Review Process

Every manuscript submitted to Resonansi undergoes an evaluation and review process to ensure its academic quality and its suitability to the focus and scope of the journal.

The peer review process consists of the following stages:

1. Initial Screening
   The editor conducts an initial check of the manuscript to ensure it fits the focus and scope of the journal and meets the established writing requirements.
2. Plagiarism Screening
   The manuscript may be checked using similarity detection software to identify indications of plagiarism or improper use of materials.
3. Editorial Assessment
   The editor assesses the initial suitability of the manuscript based on academic quality, topic relevance, novelty, and conformity with the journal's standards.
4. Peer Review
   Manuscripts that pass the initial stages are sent to reviewers whose expertise matches the subject area of the manuscript.
5. Revision
   Based on the review results, the author may be asked to revise the manuscript.
6. Editorial Decision
   The editor makes the final decision based on the reviewers' assessments and the author's revisions.
7. Publication
   Accepted manuscripts undergo editing and publication preparation before being published.

Reviewers provide objective assessments based on scientific substance, methodology, novelty, quality of references, article structure, and contribution to the field.

The final decision to accept or reject a manuscript is the authority of the editor, based on the results of the editorial and peer review process.